Posted By : John Davies, 09-Aug-2004, 09:49pm
Julian,
I still can't find my pics of the whole double radius arm setup. I do enclose a pic of the
right hand upper radius arm from inside the car. The other is a mirror image.
In the centre of the pic a bracket comes through the floor. It is not attached to the floor,
but bolted to the rear outrigger below, where the original radius arm bracket would be. The
lower end mounts the lower, original arm in the usual way, so that the upper arm is parallel to
the lower below the floor.
The upper end of the bracket is braced by a short stay from the roll cage upright and a long
cross-stay from the opposite bracket. It is thus extremely rigid. The upper radius arm goes
through the wheel arch to a bracket on the end of the transverse spring. The opening to the
wheel arch has a small enclosure with brush seals, to limit the access of water and dirt. The
opening in the floor for the upright bracket is closed by a rubber membrane, while the cavity
of the square-section bracket is closed with expanding polyurethane foam.
The Radius arm is an original adjustable Rotaflex type arm. The alloy sheet to the right is an
enclosure for the fuel tank and pumps.
Note that the upper and lower radius arms are equal length and mounted in parallel. The fixed
upright bracket is vertical, so the arms will force the wheel upright to remain vertical, in a
fore-and-aft plane, while the suspension moves. Bowing of the spring could still induce
unwanted changes in camber angle. Your arrangement will be especially prone to the latter, as
your one-leaf spring is exceptionally weak, and a locating arm to maintain the distance of the
top end of the wheel upright will be (IMHO) essential.
I believe that this double radius arm modification is one that Triumph could easily have done,
with existing parts and the addition of a few simple, cheap brackets. Some strengthening of the
floor, or bracing to the outrigger below would be needed to mount the upper bracket in a
rollcage-less road car, perhaps two brackets, bolted together through the floor, and
modification of the wheel arch to prevent mud and damp getting into the passenger space. The
rear seat would have covered the mechanism.
Sad to say, the TSSC/TRR racing regs have moved on since I designed and built it. ("Rear axle
location - one addition to original" is now only for TRs, classes B & D. Well I'm
B&gg&r&D!)
I'm grateful to the Race Secretaries for allowing me to race despite the Rules (if I can cure
the car's other problems) though I shall be compelled to cover the linkage with an alloy cowl,
as moving suspension parts in the passenger space should be. Perhaps I should put back the rear
seat!
John

Really 'trick' Vitesse Race car
-
Posted By : Julian Belcher, 13-Aug-2004,
05:08pm
John,
Interesting stuff. You have just about convinced me to put in individual top links and the
stay bar, however it will be a week or two before I get round to it. I will post a picture
for you when it is done.
Mind you the rest of the car is also in limbo, as I am waiting for some pistons to arrive
from the States before buiding the engine. The body work is still pretty cruddy, but as I
keep knocking bits off of my other car it will have to wait for that as well.
Any further information would be appreciated.
Thanks for your help
Julian
-
Posted By : John Davies, 13-Aug-2004,
06:16pm
Julian,
Glad you like it.
Knowing what you want to know and telling you will be a bit longwinded. Better to try
and meet and compare cars (Mine's bigger than your's!)
I'll not be out racing again (Hah! Didn't get racing last time - the shame!) for a
while, so I'll let you know.
Please enter your personal profile on the message board, with email address, or else we
shall have to continue this conversation in public (well no one else is really
interested, are they?)
John
PS Retro were interested - see September edition.
-
Posted By : Julian Belcher, 16-Aug-2004,
11:38pm
John,
I didn't know about personal profiles, still I've done one now. (and haven't lied
too much)
You are welcome to look at the car at any time, but I think you would be wasting
your time at the moment. Hopefully by the end of the year it will be just about
done.
What were Retro interested in? (I am too mean to buy the mag)
-
Posted By : Stephen Weblin,
17-Aug-2004, 01:57pm
I have enjoyed following your conversation. As the owrner of a modified road
car I like to see details of modified cars. I think that this is just the sort
of thing that the message board is good for. Technical details like this do not
get enough coverage in the Courier.
-
Posted By : Nigel Gibbins,
17-Aug-2004, 06:58pm
If someone writes a technical article for the courier then I could almost
guarantee it would be published. There are soooo many things to write about
in that respect - where do you start...?
John Thomason is pretty good at these.... You'll find that the racers are
pretty reluctant to tell all their secrets... but I'm sure there are many
bods out there with nice mods on their cars.... so guys... get writing....
Bernie would be sooo happy...
-
Posted By : Tim Willis,
17-Aug-2004, 10:01pm
John
Me like your estate very much. Is it like one of those F1 fan cars from
when I was very tiny.
Seriously, it looks great, but would the hot exhaust gas get drawn into
the rads? or am I talking bo**cks?
Tim
Willow Triumph
-
Posted By : John
Davies, 17-Aug-2004, 11:17pm
Tim,
I suppose it does look a little bit like the Brabham B46/B fan car
- if you added much bigger tyres, a wing and another six cylinders.
In fact the fans draw in air via side vents behind the rear wheels,
through the rad and out at the back, so I doubt if exhaust fumes
will get in. I certainly hope they don't, as although I originally
intended to duct the vents to the rad, I got bored with fettling
alloy sheet and gave up, so that the air in the whole car is drawn
back towards the rad. And while these fans draw 7 amps each, the
Brabham car ran its single fan direct from the gearbox, at
7000rpm!
I did consider taking the air for the fans from the underside of
the car, just like the Brabham and with the same intent, but A/ the
fuel tank got in the way and B/ the car is wildly overdeveloped
anyway. I called a stop to development and have tried to get it
race worthy. Still trying.
The other similarity to the Brabham will be side skirts, but sadly
not sliding, ground hugging ones. Unless the Race Committee wants
to encourage a development class?
John
-
Posted By : Julian Belcher,
17-Aug-2004, 11:47pm
Hi Steve,
I agree and have learned from reading what has been said on this site. The
20/50 oil thread was excellent.
I liked Johns idea of a "development class" and I can imagine the fun that
could be had writing the tech regs and then finding ways to get round
them.
I fully expect to be asking for help in getting my car to handle. Those two
cylinders sitting in front of the front wheels must make the Vitesse's and
GT6's really entertaining to drive.(especially with the sort of grunt
allegedly available from the 6 cylinder lump.)
-
Posted By : John Davies,
18-Aug-2004, 00:12am
Julian,
I think that racing regulations are there to be got around, and the
more ingenious the method the better. However, as I mentioned before, I
have been too clever by half this time, and only by the grace of the
racing secretaries have I any hope of racing, as the upper radius arm
is not legal. (It was, last year!).
The other view is that development is expensive, and the TSSC/TRR
Championship is intended NOT to be a rich man's series, where money can
buy advantage. The Regs say that if they do not permit you to do
something, then you are forbidden to do it! My 'extra link' was allowed
before, not only for the one class for which it is now specified. But
rule circumventing always means that rule loopholes are closed up
behind you - or this time, in front of me!
John
-
Posted By : John Davies,
17-Aug-2004, 11:28pm
Julian,
They wanted a feature on 'modified estates'. Several others were invited to
Bruntingthorpe, but only one made it. Matt Green has a real Q-car of a Mini
estate with a Vauxhall 2 litre Ecotec engine. Looks totally normal, although
the front is three inches longer than normal!
John