Posted By : Jonathan Joyce,
04-May-2004, 07:17pm
Thanks Guys for the responses.
A photo and a bit more info:
This chassis is a 1200 mk2 version, it is a complete rolling chassis with suspension, steering, engine and transmission.
It is possible that British Motor Heritage may have some info on these chassis (like how many and when they were built), I do know that
mine is from Oldham College, Lancashire
It is difficult to date however, the engine is not stamped with a number at all. My guess is it date from around 1966-67 because it has the
seatbelt mounts on the main rails and it came with Dunlop X-ply tyres(correct me if i'm wrong).
I've also had the engine running and driven it, unsuprisingly everything runs pretty sweetly.
So anyway it should be suitable for my 12/50.
I would be grateful to know if there is anything else I should be aware of when using a technical display chassis?
Many Thanks,
JJ

Herald Technical Display Unit - The Publicity Division
-
Posted By : William
Davies, 04-May-2004, 08:50pm
Hi Jonathan,
There are a few potential problems that come to mind.
I don't know at which point whether the chassis' were taken out of the production cycle, but there is evidence that they were not
fitted up as part of the normal production process. I have seen evidence that some mechanical components were not upto production
standard, the one which springs to mind is the halfshaft without a woodruff key to locate the hub - not a good thing to find once it's
been built into a 100% restored vehicle! For this reason I would want to check any mechanical parts very thoroughly before use.
Similarly it would be worth checking the basic chassis'alignment as it's not impossible that a reject chassis frame might find it's way
into an assembly that wasn't intended to be part of a saleable product.
There's also the consideration that a college chassis will usually have been dismantled and rebuilt umpteen times by (sometimes
clueless) students.
Finally, a small number of demonstration chassis' were produced for public display at shows andhigh profile venues, civic offices and
suchlike. These were sometimes prepared individually with the structural welds ground back and polished to give an unrepresentatively
clean looking unit. Grinding the welds in this way made them substantially weaker, again not a problem with a display item but
somehting of a minefield if built into a complete vehicle. I doubt very much that you have a chassis built in this way (I've only ever
seen one), but if that turned out to be the case I would want to re-weld each joint treated in this way.
Cheers,
Bill.
-
Posted By : John
Davies, 04-May-2004, 10:56pm
All,
Recycling display chassis?
Puts a new light on the "should cars be broken or restored" debate!
John
Posted By : Jonathan Joyce,
04-May-2004, 09:31pm
Thanks Bill,
I hadn't thought about these point before. Having taken a look at it, the welds are all up to the standard of any production chassis I've
seen. Also the nuts and bolts I can see are all original and undamaged so it looks like its probably not been tsken apart before,
However, I get the message, to proceed with caution and check everything.
Thanks
JJ
(ps. note it also has an unused Stanpart rear floorpan sitting on it, I have an unused boot floot too. Are these worth anything???)
-
Posted By : William
Davies, 04-May-2004, 10:11pm
Hi Jonathan,
Those panels are certainly worth having - let me know if you decide to part with them.
Cheers,
Bill.